Med Plasty
Med Plasty
Our simulation engine is constrained by peer-reviewed anatomical principles, published injection frameworks, and clinical ethics standards, not aesthetic trend data.
Our approach
Med Plasty treats AI image generation as a constrained optimisation problem: the output must simultaneously satisfy anatomical plausibility, photometric realism, identity preservation, and clinical ethics.
Rather than fine-tuning on before/after clinical photographs (which would encode practitioner variance and operator bias), we encode the constraints directly into the prompt system using clinically authoritative terminology, injection plane names, rheology classifications, established morphometric references, that the model has learned from the medical literature it was trained on.
The goal is a simulation a board-certified aesthetic injector would be comfortable presenting to a patient during a regulated consultation, not a consumer-grade transformation.
Scientific foundations
The clinical authority signals encoded into every simulation prompt.
The global injection mapping standard used in Allergan/AbbVie certification worldwide. Our cheek simulations specifically reference Ck1 (lateral zygoma), Ck2 (malar eminence), Ck3 (anterior medial, avoided for lift), Ck4 (submalar, conservative), and Ck5 (preauricular).
The deep injection plane for structural cheek, chin, and jaw work. Prompts are named by the plane, not the surface landmark, so the model anchors on real anatomical geometry rather than visual approximation.
High G-prime HA (Voluma/Lyft class) signals structural, not soft, filler behavior. The simulation models lift versus spread based on rheological class, producing distinct visual outcomes from, say, a labial filler versus a malar bolus.
The Ogee curve is the universal aesthetic reference for mid-face contour taught in aesthetic fellowships globally. The Ricketts E-line is used for chin projection assessment. Both anchor the visual outcome in established morphometric standards.
Prompt architecture
Each of the 15 supported treatments has dedicated prompts at Subtle, Moderate, and Dramatic intensities, with explicit clinical outcome descriptions, anatomical change specifications, visual outcome standards, and a comprehensive list of forbidden failure modes.
Lip augmentation additionally uses a continuous ML slider (0.5–5.0 ml), where the instruction text scales with dose, 0→1 ml is described as major change on thin lips; 4→5 ml as clinical ceiling for a single session.
Academic inquiry
We welcome inquiries from academic institutions, aesthetic medicine researchers, and clinical safety organisations interested in our methodology, prompt architecture, or outcome validation.
Get in TouchBuilt on clinical science, evaluated against published standards, and constrained by the ethics of aesthetic medicine.